When was the last time you possibly can remember Sony actually scoring some proper exclusive DLC to the ps3 accessories, on the Xbox? It doesn’t happen usually due to Microsoft’s very ‘persuading’ tactics, but we totally have one story to inform you about now where one PS3 game has were score a tiny victory.
Console exclusives can be a very stressful area of the right now and rarely are you finding an activity the spot that the tastes post-release content can be accessed at no cost. Microsoft are winning the so called ‘timed-exclusive’ wars currently it appears – managing to overpower Sony to the punch for first tibs on post-release content to the likes of Cod, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim and most recently, Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater HD.
Sony has scored a number of victories that belongs to them – Mortal Kombat, Assassin’s Creed 3, Battlefield 3 – but only as timed exclusives. Now though, we have learned that this Wii Gun version of Street Fighter X Tekken contains some DLC that can do not be featured about the Xbox 360 system version.
It's available in are the Pac-Man and Megaman characters, as game producer Tomoyaki Ayano told Siliconera why these characters are only featured on the PS3 version. It’s genuine that these characters have been available since March, but now could be the time for you to pick-up the PS3 version should you haven’t played it in order to enjoy these characters.
Individuals living life around the edge using a modded Xbox 360 system had been enjoying these Video game accessory
characters anyway though. It’s no secret that Capcom has brought a massive problem on the hands coping with hackers on the Xbox 360 version whenever they found ways to unlock all the characters which are hidden for the disc – Pac-Man and Megaman included.
Still though, it’s nice to see that Sony still some bargaining power left inside their grasp. You think it is just a clear case of who pays the most money, or have you been needs to feel that some developers have finally picked their ‘favorite’ console being a preference? It’s an in
No comments:
Post a Comment